If (maxsize == -1), then ((size_t)maxsize == SIZE_MAX). And no size can
ever be >= SIZE_MAX, so it will never return false if sysconf(3) reports
an unlimited user-name size via returning -1. Well, to be pedantic,
that disallows a user-name siz of precisely SIZE_MAX bytes when
sysconf(3) returns -1. However, that's probably a good thing; such a
long user name might trigger Undefined Behavior somewhere else, so be
cautious and disallow it. I hope nobody will be using the entire
address space for a user name.
The commit that introduced that check missed that this code had always
supported unlimited user-name sizes since it was introduced by Iker in
3b7cc05387 ("lib: replace `USER_NAME_MAX_LENGTH` macro"), and
6be85b0baf ("lib/chkname.c: Use tmp variable to avoid a -Wsign-compare
warning") even clarified this in the commit message.
So, while the code in 6a1f45d932 ("lib/chkname.c: Support unlimited
user name lengths") wasn't bad per se, the commit message was incorrect.
What that patch did was adding code for handling EINVAL (or any other
errors that a future kernel might add).
To be more pedantically correct, that commit also allowed (under certain
circumstances, user names of SIZE_MAX bytes, but those were originally
allowed (by accident), and only became disallowed in 403a2e3771
("lib/chkname.c: Take NUL byte into account"). But again, let's
disallow those, just to be cautious.
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/935>
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/935#discussion_r1477429492>
See-also: 6be85b0baf ("lib/chkname.c: Use tmp variable to avoid a -Wsign-compare warning")
Fixes: 6a1f45d932 ("lib/chkname.c: Support unlimited user name lengths")
Reviewed-by: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Cc: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Before 3b7cc05387 ("lib: replace `USER_NAME_MAX_LENGTH` macro"), this
code did use a length. It used a utmp(5) fixed-width buffer, so the
length matches the buffer size (there was no terminating NUL byte).
However, sysconf(_SC_LOGIN_NAME_MAX) returns a buffer size that accounts
for the terminating null byte; see sysconf(3). Thus, the commit that
introduced the call to sysconf(3), should have taken that detail into
account.
403a2e3771 ("lib/chkname.c: Take NUL byte into account"), by Tobias,
caught that bug in <lib/chkname.c>, but missed that the same commit that
introduced that bug, introduced the same bug in two other places.
This fixes all remaining calls to sysconf(_SC_LOGIN_NAME_MAX).
I still observe some suspicious code after this fix:
if (do_rlogin(hostname, username, max_size - 1, term, sizeof(term)))
...
login_prompt(username, max_size - 1);
We're passing size-1 to functions that want a size. But since the fix
to those will be different, let's do that in the following commits.
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/935>
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/920#issuecomment-1926002209>
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/757>
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/674>
See-also: 403a2e3771 ("lib/chkname.c: Take NUL byte into account")
Fixes: 3b7cc05387 ("lib: replace `USER_NAME_MAX_LENGTH` macro")
Reviewed-by: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Cc: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
It is slightly confusing to allow adding these only to later refuse them.
Here is a (lightly tested :) patch to also refuse them when adding.
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
Days officially roll over at 00:00 UTC, not at 12:00 UTC. I see no
reason to add that half day.
Also, remove the comment. It's likely to get stale.
So, get_date() gets the number of seconds since the Epoch. I wonder how
that thing works, but I'll assume it's something similar to getdate(3)
+ mktime(3). After that, we need to convert seconds since Epoch to days
since Epoch. That should be a simple division, AFAICS, since Epoch is
"1970‐01‐01 00:00:00 +0000 (UTC)". See mktime(3).
Fixes: 45c6603cc8 ("[svn-upgrade] Integrating new upstream version, shadow (19990709)")
Link: <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/939>
Reported-by: Michael Vetter <jubalh@iodoru.org>
Tested-by: Gus Kenion <https://github.com/kenion>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Very large values in /etc/shadow could lead to overflows. Make sure
that these calculations are saturated at LONG_MAX. Since entries are
based on days and not seconds since epoch, saturating won't hurt anyone.
Co-developed-by: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
Co-developed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
The conversion from day to seconds can be done in print_date
(renamed to print_day_as_date for clarification). This has the nice
benefit that DAY multiplication and long to time_t conversion are done
at just one place.
Co-developed-by: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
Co-developed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
If the system does not have a user name length limit, support it
accordingly. If the system has no _SC_LOGIN_NAME_MAX, use
LOGIN_NAME_MAX constant instead.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
The _SC_LOGIN_NAME_MAX value includes space for the NUL byte. The length
of name must smaller than this value to be valid.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Stoeckmann <tobias@stoeckmann.org>
The password returned by agetpass can be used directly without copying
it into a char array first.
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Samanta Navarro <ferivoz@riseup.net>
Clarify how this endless while(true) loop can be stopped by using a
boolean variable as condition and turn it into a do-while loop.
Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Samanta Navarro <ferivoz@riseup.net>
New option --stdin/-t is available for root user. It is useful
for automation/setup and it makes shadow utils passwd more versatile.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Halman <tomas@halman.net>
There is an inconsistent use of the MAYBE_UNUSED macro. Sometimes the
`int unused(x)` form is used form and others the `unused int x`. We'd
like to use the second form always.
Related-To: https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/918
Suggested-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Saavedra <psaavedra@igalia.com>
This fixes build with glibc-2.33 (newer glibc merged libdl and libpthread
into libc):
```
libtool: link: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -isystem /usr/include/bsd -DLIBBSD_OVERLAY -O2 -pipe -Wl,-O1 -o login login.o login_nopam.o -Wl,--as-needed ../lib/.libs/libshadow.a -lcrypt -lsystemd -lpam -lpam_misc -lbsd
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ../lib/.libs/libshadow.a(libshadow_la-nss.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /lib64/libdl.so.2: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
```
In Debian, the needed macro from libtool seems to be in libltdl-dev.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
argv is passed to execve(3), which for historic reasons is non-const,
but doesn't modify the strings.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Uses of this macro indicate a code smell, but in some cases, libc
functions require breaking const correctness. Use this macro to wrap
casts in such cases, so that we limit the danger of the cast.
It only permits discarding const. Discarding any other qualifiers, or
doing other type changes should result in a compile-time error.
Link: <https://software.codidact.com/posts/286575/287345#answer-287345>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
strtou[l]l(3) silently converts negative numbers into positive. This
behavior is wrong: a negative value should be parsed as a negative
value, which would underflow unsigned (long) long, and so would return
the smallest possible value, 0, and set errno to ERANGE to report an
error.
Reviewed-by: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
These functions reject negative numbers, instead of silently converting
them into unsigned, which strtou[l]l(3) do.
Reviewed-by: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
The sulogin program calls pw_entry in a loop while incorrect root
passwords are entered.
Free the previously allocated memory to avoid memory exhaustion.
Co-developed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Samanta Navarro <ferivoz@riseup.net>
We don't need 'static', because it's in main(), which is only called
once. However, we will need initialization as if it were 'static', so
use ={} to initialize it. This will allow freeing the pointers before
they have been allocated.
Cc: Samanta Navarro <ferivoz@riseup.net>
Suggested-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Those variables are only used in main(). Restrict their scope.
Keep them static (.bss), as changing that may be dangerous.
Suggested-by: Samanta Navarro <ferivoz@riseup.net>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
