While window titles really really shouldn't contain newline characters,
they are under application control and therefore may very well do.
Force the corresponding labels to be single line, to prevent offending
applications from messing up the whole window list layout.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/issues/202
As arrow functions have an implicit return value, an assignment of
this.foo = bar could have been intended as a this.foo === bar
comparison. To catch those errors, we will disallow these kinds
of assignments unless they are marked explicitly by an extra pair
of parentheses.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/91
Since version 1.50.0, gjs defines GObject.NotImplementedError for throwing
errors when a virtual method that requires a subclass implementation is not
defined.
So use this instead of a generic JS Error in such cases.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/84
PopupMenuManager's grabHelper starting from gnome-shell@7bb84da must be
an actor, so pass it explicitly instead of expecting the shell to do it
for us.
This fixes an error during pushModal that was causing a grab not to be
released.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/68
The coding style of using double quotes for translatable strings
and single quotes otherwise is unnecessarily complex and cannot
be enforced with an eslint rule.
Simply use single quotes consistently for all strings.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/57
Instead of keeping the first property on the same line as the opening
brace and aligning the properties, use a four-space indent. This brings
us closer to gjs' coding style, and as a bonus helps keeping lines in
the soft 80 character limit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/57
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/57
When destructuring multiple return values, we often use trailing commas
to indicate that there are additional elements that we are ignoring.
There isn't anything inherently wrong with that, but it's a style that's
too confusing for eslint - on the one hand we require a space after a
comma, on the other hand we require no space before closing brackets.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/49
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/merge_requests/49
Now that PanelMenu.Button was made an StWidget subclass, the destroy()
method actually maps to the ClutterActor method, and overriding it
results in warnings when the extension is disabled. So instead, use
the existing ::destroy handler.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/issues/113
Window lists are per-monitor, so workspaces are implemented by
simply hiding all buttons that correspond to windows/apps on
other workspaces. That means we need to take the visibility
into account when handling scroll-events to switch through the
list, or else we'll end up switching "randomly" between workspaces.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/issues/78
As of the libmutter API version 3 MetaScreen does no longer exist.
Functionality that previously depended on MetaScreen has been moved
elsewhere (e.g. MetaDisplay or MetaWorkspaceManager etc).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759538
This is a relatively recent addition to the standard we can use where we
don't care about the actual position of an element inside the array.
(Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() do behave differently in edge cases,
for example in the handling of NaN, but those don't matter to us)
We can only know about override settings that are provided by the
upstream GNOME or GNOME Classic sessions, but not any custom sessions
created by admins, users or distributions. Handle that case by falling
back to the original settings.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell-extensions/issues/62
Florian Müllner
Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Jonas Ådahl