PawletOS/app_Settings
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix assertion in VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest.

Browse Source 
The test was asserting that VISIBILIY_NO_OVERRIDE (an int)
is not contained in a List<String> (*), which is (trivially)
true but doesn't test what the test intends to test.

(*) or a List<CharSequence>, which is similarly wrong /
  meaningless, prior to the base CL http://ag/3345932

VisibilityPreferenceController uses Integer.toString() to
construct corresponding String values, so the test should
be checking for that String value. For consistency with
  testUpdateState_noGlobalRestriction()
this CL uses the equivalent (and slightly shorter)
String.valueOf(int) instead of Integer.toString().

Test: EXPERIMENTAL_USE_OPENJDK9=1.8 make RunSettingsRoboTests \
   ROBOTEST_FILTER=VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest

Change-Id: I48644729d3e0f29d7ffcc981aeef650f2b1426ef
This commit is contained in:
Tobias Thierer
2017-12-11 17:36:39 +00:00
parent 8f68856823
commit 9d01fe6823
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
tests/robotests/src/com/android/settings/notification/VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest.java
View File

@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ public class VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest {
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(CharSequence[].class);
verify(pref, times(1)).setEntryValues(argumentCaptor.capture());
assertFalse(toStringList(argumentCaptor.getValue())
.contains(VISIBILITY_NO_OVERRIDE));
.contains(String.valueOf(VISIBILITY_NO_OVERRIDE)));
}
@Test
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ public class VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest {
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(CharSequence[].class);
verify(pref, times(1)).setEntryValues(argumentCaptor.capture());
assertFalse(toStringList(argumentCaptor.getValue())
.contains(VISIBILITY_NO_OVERRIDE));
.contains(String.valueOf(VISIBILITY_NO_OVERRIDE)));
}
@Test