For arrays of char, both NITEMS() and SIZEOF_ARRAY() return the same
value. However, NITEMS() is more appropriate. Think of wide-character
equivalents of the same code; with NITEMS(), they would continue to be
valid, while with SIZEOF_ARRAY(), they would be wrong.
In the implementation of ZUSTR2STP(), we want SIZEOF_ARRAY() within the
static assert, because we're just comparing the sizes of the source and
destination buffers, and we don't care if we compare sizes or numbers of
elements, and using sizes is just simpler. But we want NITEMS() in the
zustr2stp() call, where we want to copy a specific number of characters.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
We've recently fixed several bugs in the calculation of the size in this
function call. Use this wrapper to prevent similar mistakes in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
We're not even zeroing the last byte after this call. This was a
completely gratuitous truncation of one byte, and the resulting
character array still wasn't guaranteed to be null terminated, because
strncpy(3) can't do that.
Just to clarify, none of these structures needed zeroing, as they are
treated as null-padded fixed-size character arrays. Calling strncpy(3)
was actually the correct call, and the only problem was unnecessarily
truncating strings by one byte more than necessary.
Cc: Matthew House <mattlloydhouse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
We were copying from a (zero-padded) fixed-width character array to a
string, but strncpy(3) is meant to do the opposite thing. ZUSTR2STP()
is designed to be used in this case (like strncat(3)).
Fixes: f40bdfa66a ("libmisc: implement `get_session_host()`")
Cc: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
free(NULL) is valid; there's no need to check for NULL. Simplify.
Fixes: 5178f8c5af ("utmp: call prepare_utmp() even if utent is NULL")
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
This makes it harder to make mistakes while editing the code. Since the
sizeof's can be autocalculated, let the machine do that. It also
reduces the cognitive load while reading the code.
Cc: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
These calls were intending to copy from a NUL-padded (possibly
non-NUL-terminated) character sequences contained in fixed-width arrays,
into a string, where extra padding is superfluous. Use the appropriate
call, which removes the superfluous work. That reduces the chance of
confusing maintainers about the intention of the code.
While at it, use the appropriate third parameter, which is the size of
the source buffer, and not the one of the destination buffer. As a side
effect, this reduces the use of '-1', which itself reduces the chance of
off-by-one bugs.
Also, since using sizeof() on an array is dangerous, use SIZEOF_ARRAY().
Cc: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
