Except for the added (and sorted) includes, the removal of redundant
parentheses, a few cases that have been refactored for readability, and
a couple of non-string cases that I've left out of the change, this
patch can be approximated with the following semantic patch:
$ cat ~/tmp/spatch/streq.sp
@@
expression s;
@@
- '\0' == *s
+ streq(s, "")
@@
expression s;
@@
- '\0' == s[0]
+ streq(s, "")
@@
expression s;
@@
- *s == '\0'
+ streq(s, "")
@@
expression s;
@@
- s[0] == '\0'
+ streq(s, "")
$ find contrib/ lib* src/ -type f \
| xargs spatch --in-place --sp-file ~/tmp/spatch/streq.sp;
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Except for the added (and sorted) includes, and the removal of redundant
parentheses, this patch can be approximated with the following semantic
patch:
$ cat ~/tmp/spatch/streq.sp;
@@
expression a, b;
@@
- strcmp(a, b) == 0
+ streq(a, b)
@@
expression a, b;
@@
- 0 == strcmp(a, b)
+ streq(a, b)
@@
expression a, b;
@@
- !strcmp(a, b)
+ streq(a, b)
$ find contrib/ lib* src/ -type f \
| xargs spatch --sp-file ~/tmp/spatch/streq.sp --in-place;
$ git restore lib/string/strcmp/streq.h;
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
'endptr' is appropriate internally in strtol(3) because it's a pointer
to 'end', and 'end' itself is a pointer to one-after-the-last character
of the numeric string. In other words,
endptr == &end
However, naming the pointer whose address we pass to strtol(3)'s
'endptr' feels wrong, and causes me trouble while parsing the code; I
need to double check the number of dereferences, because something feels
wrong in my head.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
- Set errno = 0 before the call. Otherwise, it may contain anything.
- ERANGE is not the only possible errno value of these functions. They
can also set it to EINVAL.
- Any errno value after these calls is bad; just compare against 0.
- Don't check for the return value; just errno. This function is
guaranteed to not modify errno on success (POSIX).
- Check endptr == str, which may or may not set EINVAL.
Suggested-by: Iker Pedrosa <ipedrosa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
The multiplication was already invoking UB. The test was flawed.
Use __builtin_mul_overflow() instead.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
strtol(3) doesn't specify a return value if (value == endptr).
It is always an error, if (value==endptr).
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
