New upstream version 4.6

This commit is contained in:
Balint Reczey
2019-03-03 23:31:24 +01:00
parent 589f97ade4
commit b0729855e8
673 changed files with 18421 additions and 16992 deletions
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 0
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 0
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 2
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ ERASECHAR 0177
KILLCHAR 025
# 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK when it was used
# 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her
# There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up their
# mind.
#UMASK 022
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ GID_MAX 60000
#
# Max number of login retries if password is bad. This will most likely be
# overriden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# overridden by PAM, since the default pam_unix module has it's own built
# in of 3 retries. However, this is a safe fallback in case you are using
# an authentication module that does not enforce PAM_MAXTRIES.
#
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ MAX_MEMBERS_PER_GROUP 0
# #
# These options are now handled by PAM. Please #
# edit the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ to #
# enable the equivelants of them.
# enable the equivalents of them.
#
###############