gcc 10 and 11 produce an error when compiling libcamera in release mode:
In file included from ../../src/libcamera/base/object.cpp:13:
../../include/libcamera/base/message.h: In member function ‘void libcamera::Object::notifyThreadMove()’:
../../include/libcamera/base/message.h:58:47: error: array subscript ‘const libcamera::InvokeMessage[0]’ is partly outside array bounds of ‘libcamera::Message [1]’ [-Werror=array-bounds]
58 | Semaphore *semaphore() const { return semaphore_; }
| ^~~~~~~~~~
../../src/libcamera/base/object.cpp:280:17: note: while referencing ‘msg’
280 | Message msg(Message::ThreadMoveMessage);
| ^~~
This seems to be a false positive, given that msg->type() can never be
equal to Message::InvokeMessage in Object::message() when called from
Object::notifyThreadMove(), as the message is created there with the
Message::ThreadMoveMessage type. The problem as been reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105400, but the error
nonetheless needs to be fixed without waiting for a new gcc release, and
a dynamic_cast does the job with a small additional runtime cost that
shouldn't be a big issue, given that moving objects between threads is a
rare operation.
Bug: https://bugs.libcamera.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Objects are not expected to be connected to the same signal more than
once. Doing so likely indicates a bug in the code, and can be
highlighted in debug builds with an assert that performs a lookup on the
signals_ list.
While it is possible to allow the implementation to let objects connect
to a specific signal multiple times, there are no expected use cases for
this in libcamera and this behaviour is restricted to favour defensive
programming by raising an error when this occurs.
Remove the support in the test framework which uses multiple Signal
connections on the same object, and update the test to use a second
Signal.
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Usage of 'method' to refer to member functions comes from Java. The C++
standard uses the term 'function' only. Replace 'method' with 'function'
or 'member function' through the whole code base and documentation.
While at it, fix two typos (s/backeng/backend/).
The BoundMethod and Object::invokeMethod() are left as-is here, and will
be addressed separately.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Move the functionality for the following components to the new
base support library:
- BoundMethod
- EventDispatcher
- EventDispatcherPoll
- Log
- Message
- Object
- Signal
- Semaphore
- Thread
- Timer
While it would be preferable to see these split to move one component
per commit, these components are all interdependent upon each other,
which leaves us with one big change performing the move for all of them.
Reviewed-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
