Jinja2 templates help separate the logic related to the template from
the generation of the data. The python code becomes much clearer as a
result.
As an added bonus, we can use a single template file for both controls
and properties.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
The init_py_*() functions are called by the top-level entry point of the
libcamera Python module to initialize different parts of the bindings.
They are declared in py_main.cpp where they are called, and defined in
separate compilation units. This results in functions being defined
without a corresponding declaration, and will generate warnings when we
enable -Wmissing-declarations.
Fix this by moving the function declarations from py_main.c to
py_main.h, and including py_main.h in the various compilation units that
need it.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Label draft controls and properties through the "draft" vendor tag
and deprecate the existing "draft: true" mechanism. This uses the new
vendor tags mechanism to place draft controls in the same
libcamera::controls::draft namespace and provide a defined control id
range for these controls. This requires moving all draft controls from
control_ids.yaml to control_ids_draft.yaml.
One breaking change in this commit is that draft control ids also move
to the libcamera::controls::draft namespace from the existing
libcamera::controls namespace. This is desirable to avoid API breakages
when adding new libcamera controls. So, for example, the use of
controls::NOISE_REDUCTION_MODE will need to be replaced with
controls::draft::NOISE_REDUCTION_MODE.
Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Add support for vendor-specific controls and properties to libcamera.
The controls/properties are defined by a "vendor" tag in the YAML
control description file, for example:
vendor: rpi
controls:
- MyExampleControl:
type: string
description: |
Test for libcamera vendor-specific controls.
This will now generate a control id in the libcamera::controls::rpi
namespace, ensuring no id conflict between different vendors, core or
draft libcamera controls. Similarly, a ControlIdMap control is generated
in the libcamera::controls::rpi namespace.
A #define LIBCAMERA_HAS_RPI_VENDOR_CONTROLS is also generated to allow
applications to conditionally compile code if the specific vendor
controls are present. For the python bindings, the control is available
with libcamera.controls.rpi.MyExampleControl. The above controls
example applies similarly to properties.
Existing libcamera controls defined in control_ids.yaml are given the
"libcamera" vendor tag.
A new --mode flag is added to gen-controls.py to specify the mode of
operation, either 'controls' or 'properties' to allow the code generator
to correctly set the #define string.
As a drive-by, sort and redefine the output command line argument in
gen-controls.py and gen-py-controls.py to ('--output', '-o') for
consistency.
Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush@raspberrypi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
We are using pybind11 'smart_holder' branch to solve the Camera
destructor issue (see the comment in this patch, or the commit
that originally added Python bindings support).
As it would be very nice to use the mainline pybind11 (which is packaged
in distributions), this patch adds a workaround allowing us to move to
the mainline pybind11 version.
The workaround is simply creating a custom holder class
(PyCameraSmartPtr), used only for the Camera, which wraps around the
shared_ptr. This makes the compiler happy.
Moving to mainline pybind11 is achieved with:
- Change the pybind11 wrap to point to the mainline pybdind11 version
- Tell pybind11 to always use shared_ptr<> as the holder for
PyCameraManager, as we use the singleton pattern for the
PyCameraManager, and using shared_ptr<> to manage it is a requirement
- Tell pybind11 to always use PyCameraSmartPtr<> as the holder for Camera
- Change the meson.build file to use a system-installed pybind11
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
The Python bindings controls generation was not very good. It only
covered the enums and they were in the main namespace.
This adds the controls somewhat similarly to the C++ side. We will have
e.g.:
libcamera.controls.Brightness
libcamera.controls.AeMeteringModeEnum.CentreWeighted
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
