Fix the eval() function for Pwls that contain only a single point.
Remove the should_fail from the corresponding test case.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
If a Pwl is evaluated outside of the domain, it gets extrapolated
linearly. Fix the documentation as it states otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
The Pwl::Pwl(const std::vector<Point> &) constructor is inefficient as
it makes a copy of the given points vector. Add a second constructor
that takes an rvalue reference to a points vector to provide move
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Add a size() function to the Pwl class to return the number of points in
the piecewise linear function. This is useful, for instance, to validate
that all points added with append() or prepend() have been taken into
account.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
The Pwl::empty() function is a one-liner that can be easily optimized by
the compiler given the chance. Make it inline.
While at it, move the function documentation block to match the class
declaration order.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Stefan Klug
Milan ZamazalandLaurent Pinchart
Paul Elder