libcamera: ipa: Remove IPAModuleInfo license field

The IPAModuleInfo license field isn't needed anymore now that modules
are cryptographically signed. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
This commit is contained in:
Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-29 07:22:47 +03:00
parent eab143ee69
commit ebd0cae455
6 changed files with 1 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@@ -216,27 +216,6 @@ Span<uint8_t> elfLoadSymbol(Span<uint8_t> elf, const char *symbol)
* \var IPAModuleInfo::name
* \brief The name of the IPA module
*
* \var IPAModuleInfo::license
* \brief License of the IPA module
*
* This license is used to determine whether to force isolation of the IPA in
* a separate process. If the license is "Proprietary", then the IPA will
* be isolated. If the license is open-source, then the IPA will be allowed to
* run without isolation if the user enables it. The license should be an
* SPDX license string. The following licenses are currently available to
* allow the IPA to run unisolated:
*
* - GPL-2.0-only
* - GPL-2.0-or-later
* - GPL-3.0-only
* - GPL-3.0-or-later
* - LGPL-2.1-only
* - LGPL-2.1-or-later
* - LGPL-3.0-only
* - LGPL-3.0-or-later
*
* Any other license will cause the IPA to be run isolated.
*
* \todo Allow user to choose to isolate open source IPAs
*/