libcamera: controls: Make ControlValue get/set accessors template methods
The ControlValue get accessors are implemented with functions of different names, whlie the set accessors use polymorphism to support different control types. This isn't very consistent and intuitive. Make the API clearer by using template methods. This will also have the added advantage that support for the new types will only require adding template specialisations, without adding new methods. Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ protected:
|
||||
<< " Bool: " << boolean.toString()
|
||||
<< endl;
|
||||
|
||||
if (integer.getInt() != 1234) {
|
||||
if (integer.get<int>() != 1234) {
|
||||
cerr << "Failed to get Integer" << endl;
|
||||
return TestFail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (boolean.getBool() != true) {
|
||||
if (boolean.get<bool>() != true) {
|
||||
cerr << "Failed to get Boolean" << endl;
|
||||
return TestFail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -45,19 +45,19 @@ protected:
|
||||
return TestFail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
value.set(true);
|
||||
value.set<bool>(true);
|
||||
if (value.isNone()) {
|
||||
cerr << "Failed to set an empty object" << endl;
|
||||
return TestFail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (value.getBool() != true) {
|
||||
if (value.get<bool>() != true) {
|
||||
cerr << "Failed to get Booleans" << endl;
|
||||
return TestFail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
value.set(10);
|
||||
if (value.getInt() != 10) {
|
||||
value.set<int>(10);
|
||||
if (value.get<int>() != 10) {
|
||||
cerr << "Failed to get Integer" << endl;
|
||||
return TestFail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user