Bug: 110589286
Test: fingerprint enrolling still works
Test: enrollment flow with and without a pin set up still works properly
Test: enrollment continues when configuration changes, stops otherwise
Change-Id: I39f76c7f1a16e9533cef573f87cf4b81cb20cb18
This method is used to check whether data in battery tip is still
valid. If not, try recover the data or dismiss the tip.
Change-Id: Idc9e4d49f99e33d3f5e82e694dc78227fc1da41c
Fixes: 111218723
Test: RunSettingsRoboTests
- Data saver
- A few special permission access pages
- Picture-in-picture
- Premium sms
- do not disturb access
- And a unrelated cleanup: move EmptyTextFragment from
notification/ to widget/
Bug: 70720645
Test: robotests
Change-Id: I6a87f712bf81f9fd32fa9a3826fba851ca748409
enter "Home screen backup password" in "Developer Settings",
do nothings and then click "Set backup password", There will
be a toast display "New backup password set".
The new password field cannot be empty.
Bug: https://partnerissuetracker.corp.google.com/u/2/issues/111261338
Test: empty string can not be set as a password
Signed-off-by: xiamin <xiamin@xiaomi.com>
In the WifiTetherApBandController the incorrect method was
being called to check if the device is 5Ghz compatible. We
were calling is5GhzBandSupported directly, but we were
supposed to call isDualBandSupported instead.
Test: robotests updated
Bug: 110793581
Change-Id: I61d3ff10abedde6196b8e29591ebfd3272dbbcd9
Create a handler for any slice that doesn't include anything
from a PreferenceController.
Test: robotests
Change-Id: If23947152d61877537d0cac6240e96b9ab977bce
Bug: 80263568
Test: make -j RunSettingsRoboTests
Test: manual, unify when profile lock is compliant
Test: manual, unify when profile lock is not compliant
Test: manual, unify when profile lock is empty
Fixes: 110262879
Change-Id: I0dfa885f2a0e44e09c217b3e7766b367f1340c9e
Only primary user can set LOCK_SCREEN_SHOW_NOTIFICATIONS,
profile can only set notifications to be redacted. When the
user changes notification settings for a work app, this class
is invoked from the profile, meaning it attempts to read
LOCK_SCREEN_SHOW_NOTIFICATIONS for the profile, which is not
there. As a result the function always returs 0 for work apps.
Bug: 111112011
Test: atest packages/apps/Settings/tests/robotests/src/com/android/settings/notification/VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest.java
Change-Id: Ifb50209ea8ea8fb6639f00ca8b7cf8a4295890ad
Merged-In: Ifb50209ea8ea8fb6639f00ca8b7cf8a4295890ad
(cherry picked from commit f14de789f4)
In a call, the flag of UserManager is changed, then "Add user" and
"Guest" items in Settings are still enabled.
To fix this issue, these items will be disabled according to
"UserManager#canSwitchUsers".
Bug: 80447394
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests ROBOTEST_FILTER=UserSettingsTest
Change-Id: Ib4c754603418528f5c6f1c78b8aabf33e863c8b9
Only primary user can set LOCK_SCREEN_SHOW_NOTIFICATIONS,
profile can only set notifications to be redacted. When the
user changes notification settings for a work app, this class
is invoked from the profile, meaning it attempts to read
LOCK_SCREEN_SHOW_NOTIFICATIONS for the profile, which is not
there. As a result the function always returs 0 for work apps.
Bug: 111112011
Test: atest packages/apps/Settings/tests/robotests/src/com/android/settings/notification/VisibilityPreferenceControllerTest.java
Change-Id: Ifb50209ea8ea8fb6639f00ca8b7cf8a4295890ad
Bug: 110739775
Test: Verfied that the icon is displayed correctly if icon-shape override is applied in laucher
Change-Id: Ice7e15a982479960b2644defa33dbdb036c6bd42
The PowerUsageSummary fragment doesn't use the regular pattern
of a static method to build preference controllers, which can be
accessed by both DashboardFragment and BaseSearchIndexProvider,
because it depends on the Activity & Fragment in the creation of
the preference controllers.
The correct & long-term solution here would be to move those dependencies
out of the getPreferenceControllers method, such that the we could use a
static buildPreferenceControllers method, as seen in DisplaySettings.java.
In the mean time, we know that BatteryPercentagePrefController should not
show up on devices, so we conditionally add the the preference controller's
into getNonIndexableKeys method based on controller Availability, which
BasePreferenceController normally does automatically with a getPreferenceController
method in the host fragment's SEARCH_INDEX_DATA_PROVIDER.
Since this is a short-term solution, it should not be merged into master, and thus
I am not marking the bug as fixed.
Bug: 110894466
Test: Robotests
Change-Id: I06f814571d0b72fbf020dd11a9d23a9eb9907bfd
Merged-In: I5993d332dbd218c981ef5432aebb735d0000f67a
- Make SettingsPreferenceFragment implement Indexable directly
- Add existing fragments that are SettingsPrefFragment but not Indexable
to grandfather list.
- Fix "font size" fragment so it shows up in search properly.
- Remove duplicates for "lock screen display", "Screen saver".
Bug: 70720645
Test: robotests
Change-Id: I44ce0cac0fdf5e882b315861bb4bebc45dbe01e6
