Doing a factory data reset used to always erase eSIMs. Then a few months
ago we added a default-on checkbox to let users opt out of erasing the
eSIM during this process, but only had it show for some devices (ones
which support the "fastboot oem esim_erase" command) by adding a system
property named masterclear.allow_retain_esim_profiles_after_fdr.
When recently updating the strings shown in the factory data reset
screen and the confirmation dialog, we changed the code so that if that
the checkbox is hidden we'll pass false for the ERASE_ESIMS_EXTRA
parameter sent to the factory data reset confirmation dialog. This had
the unintended side effect of making devices that don't specify true for
masterclear.allow_retain_esim_profiles_after_fdr skip erasing the eSIM.
This CL fixes that by removing the "is the checkbox hidden" check, going
back to the previous behavior of just using the checkbox value, which is
on by default even if hidden.
Fixes: 135284765
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: Ia9f335920e4e3c4a90f0a6a49d1722a0c19ea83d
- Use tint instead of custom fillColor to be consistent with overlays.
- Standardize on using @android:color/white as fill color
- Update list of overlayed icons.
Bug: 131346125
Test: make
Change-Id: I4bc88e5842ba2f149356929a77b81459ce5042c5
- Use tint instead of custom fillColor to be consistent with overlays.
- Update list of overlayed icons.
Bug: 131346125
Test: make
Change-Id: Ib548c0b47db0064bcb1536c9b7a650912f28273f
Merged-In: Ib548c0b47db0064bcb1536c9b7a650912f28273f
Bug: 132292477
Test: View all related screens.
(cherry picked from commit 1e7c172ad5)
This should have been submitted with ag/8109287
Bug: 136012133
Test: Clicked through permission screens on cuttlefish
Change-Id: I2663aa365baf78ccc6f0a3d585b09da0dd387970
When active cellular internet is switched to CBRS in DSDS case,
default data sub id may not be changed. Fix by using active
subscription id and pass this sub id to entitlement app.
Bug: 134994718
Test: atest TetherServiceTest
Test: manual test with carrer SIMs.
Change-Id: I30a1d70c0690f0dba8f4171a2bde884f9b7ccfc4
Added a module licenses option that lives in Legal information settings.
Clicking that option opens module licenses page, which displays every
module by name, filtered to exclude modules without license files.
Clicking a module in the list opens HTMLViewer.
Created ModuleLicensesProvider, a new ContentProvider that serves as a
redirect for the Uris sent to HTMLViewer so that they open asset files.
In order to provide the redirect, the provider will write the license file
to a file in Settings' cache directory when the license does not exist
in the cache or is outdated. The provider then opens that cached file.
Fixes: 135183006
Test: robotests
Change-Id: I7d69da34780c8c4efb150d0c0411078c12bc80d8
On the SIM details page, the preference leading to a page for
configuring wifi calling will appear based on the results of the
MobileNetworkUtils#isWifiCallingEnabled helper function. That helper
uses the ImsManager to check several conditions, among them both
isWfcEnabledByPlatform and isWfcProvisionedOnDevice.
The page for configuring wifi calling has a tabbed UX, with one tab for
each active subscription that supports it. The WifiCallingSettings class
gets a list of the active subscriptions to determine which tabs to show,
and removes any that don't support wifi calling, but was only using the
isWfcEnabledByPlatform test to do so. This is a problem because the code
for showing the contents inside the tab, in WifiCallingSettingsForSub,
includes a sanity check of isWfcProvisionedOnDevice and calls finish()
if that returns false.
What this meant in practice is that if you happened to have 2
subscriptions where one returns true for both isWfcEnabledByPlatform and
isWfcProvisionedOnDevice, but the other only returned true for
isWfcEnabledByPlatform, then you'd never be able to succesfully use the
wifi calling page at all because the tab for the subscription you
*aren't* trying to configure would always call finish() early.
The right long term solution to this problem is probably to remove the
tabbed UX entirely from this page, since we probably don't need it given
the overall new multi-SIM UX. But there may still be legacy uses and
that is likely a bigger change than we want to make right now.
As a stopgap, this CL just adds a check of isWfcProvisionedOnDevice to
the code for filtering out ineligible subscriptions from the tabbed
interface, which we should have always had anyway.
Fixes: 135591718
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: I656c3d3fb30cb6fabcb86685eae38c5f0cd0c6f2
Fixes: 134965754
Test: Verified slice appears when not enrolled.
Test: Verified slice does not appear when enrolled.
Test: Verified slice disappears after clicking on icon and going back
to settings page.
Change-Id: Id1c4458742ab622df8d5881e926fe54684b36843
This reverts commit 43374eabb8.
Reason for revert: No longer needed because we are using whitelist for
SMS permission
Fixes: 135213238
Test: presubmit
Change-Id: I182be4a1136521f325866e70e875439c17816ef2
For some kinds of telephony changes that might happen while we're
already showing one of these dialogs, we already get sent a new intent
for the dialog which we internally convert into a refresh of the dialog
contents instead of stacking a new copy on top of the old one.
But it turns out there are some other cases where the telephony stack
doesn't send a new intent for the dialog but *does* send a change event
through the SubscriptionManager, and we want to respond to those as
well. This CL adds a listener for those events.
Fixes: 135276696
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: Ifb93ae95f45fda5831e112306dd9361ccaa5119c
(cherry picked from commit 6a1d7e60ac)
For some kinds of telephony changes that might happen while we're
already showing one of these dialogs, we already get sent a new intent
for the dialog which we internally convert into a refresh of the dialog
contents instead of stacking a new copy on top of the old one.
But it turns out there are some other cases where the telephony stack
doesn't send a new intent for the dialog but *does* send a change event
through the SubscriptionManager, and we want to respond to those as
well. This CL adds a listener for those events.
Fixes: 135276696
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: Ifb93ae95f45fda5831e112306dd9361ccaa5119c
That is caused by layout xml changes. The radio button was clickable
in old xml resource. But it is not clickable in new xml resource.
Therefore we can't receive click callback. Fixed by changing
Radio button state when preference is clicked.
Fixes: 135285101
Test: manual, make RunSettingsRoboTests ROBOTEST_FILTER="com.android.settings.tts"
Change-Id: Idd7bf37d9ccbc1b56d41978d19dc05c8a81cc49a
As we don't allow pSIM modem disablment, we should simply use isActiveSubId
to decide whether a subscription's preferences is changable. This will
avoid potential modem bugs that reports wrong modem status that result
in Setting's UX error.
Bug: 135222940
Test: manual and robo
Change-Id: I7cccf2fdab7c89d26dac4daad51cd5d6f3a90eba
When the phone is in DSDS mode and the user tries to send an MMS message
from the SIM that isn't the default for data, we need to pop up a
notification letting them know that the action can't succeed unless they
turn on the advanced option to allow data use for MMS messages. This
notification was using the operator name instead of the subscription
display name, so it didn't reflect any renaming the user might have done
to keep track of their SIMs, which is obviously confusing especially if
they have two different SIMs for the same carrier. This CL switches to
using the subscription display name in this notification.
Fixes: 134771858
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: I6995bf9dd6d5e9544e26f0d8e30e97c4e73ab783
In cases where MobileData should not be changed:
- Airplane mode
- No data subscriptions
we will return a null slice, rather than a slice with a no-op intent
attached as a primary action. The problem with the no-op intent is that
Slices assumes all actions are by definition, actionable, and the the
TalkBack description announces that the item is clickable, which it
really isn't.
We will in the future investigate disabled actions on Slices, but this
is the short-term fix.
Fixes: 132924748
Test: Robolectric
Test: Panel tester app
Change-Id: I1d62af32fe2dd985f0b52ea4188651e76f9c90ec
Bug: 131447780
Test: Manual test on device
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests ROBOTEST_FILTER=RadioButtonPreferenceWithExtraWidgetTest
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests ROBOTEST_FILTER=SystemNavigationGestureSettingsTest
Change-Id: I9fcd1a50c77689118857326de0cf8082e835b491
