Add new reminder string in "Magnify with shortcut" page when
it's under gesture navigation mode.
Reference link of screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uo31FZebhXKcCR8QY_WrgEPiInzARmIl/view?usp=sharing
Bug: 134645913
Test: Visual
Change-Id: Ibbaa162d4acf0fdeed8c98b2aa1d83953880e6a6
Merged-In: Ibbaa162d4acf0fdeed8c98b2aa1d83953880e6a6
Move the switch after the caption preview and change the oreder of the
settings inside in caption preferences in Accessibility settings.
Reference link for screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EQLpfQFnJTwU1F8vLAOSHPYqSXKWL_ap/view?usp=sharing
Bug: 130755332
Test: Visual
Change-Id: Icb4dabdef71be165a21d1bde474872ee0bb35bfa
Merged-In: Icb4dabdef71be165a21d1bde474872ee0bb35bfa
(cherry picked from commit fd1f1c0f82)
Fixes: 137285390
Test: Verified that SecuritySettings no longer crashes.
Test: Verified that this PrefenceController no longer shows up
if the device does not support it.
Test: Verified that this PreferenceController no longer
shows up when the work profile is disabled.
Change-Id: I10f015e18491b203db6f942f07034d55f620cfe5
Doing a factory data reset used to always erase eSIMs. Then a few months
ago we added a default-on checkbox to let users opt out of erasing the
eSIM during this process, but only had it show for some devices (ones
which support the "fastboot oem esim_erase" command) by adding a system
property named masterclear.allow_retain_esim_profiles_after_fdr.
When recently updating the strings shown in the factory data reset
screen and the confirmation dialog, we changed the code so that if that
the checkbox is hidden we'll pass false for the ERASE_ESIMS_EXTRA
parameter sent to the factory data reset confirmation dialog. This had
the unintended side effect of making devices that don't specify true for
masterclear.allow_retain_esim_profiles_after_fdr skip erasing the eSIM.
This CL fixes that by removing the "is the checkbox hidden" check, going
back to the previous behavior of just using the checkbox value, which is
on by default even if hidden.
Fixes: 135284765
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: Ia9f335920e4e3c4a90f0a6a49d1722a0c19ea83d
From traces analysis, we found getFreeBytes
was taking a long time to return.
getFreeBytes was used when storage controller
tried to get storage information.
In order to prevent this case, we put the action
which takes too much time in background thread.
Test: I can't reproduce it locally. From code view,
this is a reasonable root cause.
Fixes: 136268875
Change-Id: I78e42cde88553c003f198cffb5747b352055f59a
(cherry picked from commit 0c37f019f6)
For devices which provide biometric authentication options, such as
fingerprint or face, we should be showing different content on the lock
setup screen during the corp account setup wizard. Namely, the title
should read "Choose screen lock", and the "Not now" option should be
changed to "Continue without [auth method]". However, we currently only
check for whether fingerprint authentication is available, leading to
incorrect text for devices with face authentication.
This CL fixes the issue by changing the introducing a private method to
check for any biometric authentication (currently just mForFingerprint ||
mForFace). It then uses this method in place of the existing
mForFingerprint checks in SetupChooseLockGeneric.
Test: On a device with fingerprint auth and one with face auth:
1. Set a work profile with TestDPC and add some password quality requirement
2. adb shell settings put global device_provisioned
3. adb shell am start -a android.app.action.SET_NEW_PARENT_PROFILE_PASSWORD
4. Verify that the correct content is now shown (screenshot/xZPVtpa3j3Z)
5. Verify that setting lock with and without biometric auth still works
Fixes: 136556653
Change-Id: I46d3c964f05986aa97cc8ed77fe0ac125337ddd0
Bug: 132292477
Test: View all related screens.
(cherry picked from commit 1e7c172ad5)
This should have been submitted with ag/8109287
Bug: 136012133
Test: Clicked through permission screens on cuttlefish
Change-Id: I2663aa365baf78ccc6f0a3d585b09da0dd387970
When active cellular internet is switched to CBRS in DSDS case,
default data sub id may not be changed. Fix by using active
subscription id and pass this sub id to entitlement app.
Bug: 134994718
Test: atest TetherServiceTest
Test: manual test with carrer SIMs.
Change-Id: I30a1d70c0690f0dba8f4171a2bde884f9b7ccfc4
View of content parent should not account for system screen decorations
and make statusbar layout can be overrided by stencil customization.
Bug: 126065441
Test: Manual
Change-Id: Iefbdc4a0613e1ae0b63c35769f1c8ec9581d7869
Added a module licenses option that lives in Legal information settings.
Clicking that option opens module licenses page, which displays every
module by name, filtered to exclude modules without license files.
Clicking a module in the list opens HTMLViewer.
Created ModuleLicensesProvider, a new ContentProvider that serves as a
redirect for the Uris sent to HTMLViewer so that they open asset files.
In order to provide the redirect, the provider will write the license file
to a file in Settings' cache directory when the license does not exist
in the cache or is outdated. The provider then opens that cached file.
Fixes: 135183006
Test: robotests
Change-Id: I7d69da34780c8c4efb150d0c0411078c12bc80d8
On the SIM details page, the preference leading to a page for
configuring wifi calling will appear based on the results of the
MobileNetworkUtils#isWifiCallingEnabled helper function. That helper
uses the ImsManager to check several conditions, among them both
isWfcEnabledByPlatform and isWfcProvisionedOnDevice.
The page for configuring wifi calling has a tabbed UX, with one tab for
each active subscription that supports it. The WifiCallingSettings class
gets a list of the active subscriptions to determine which tabs to show,
and removes any that don't support wifi calling, but was only using the
isWfcEnabledByPlatform test to do so. This is a problem because the code
for showing the contents inside the tab, in WifiCallingSettingsForSub,
includes a sanity check of isWfcProvisionedOnDevice and calls finish()
if that returns false.
What this meant in practice is that if you happened to have 2
subscriptions where one returns true for both isWfcEnabledByPlatform and
isWfcProvisionedOnDevice, but the other only returned true for
isWfcEnabledByPlatform, then you'd never be able to succesfully use the
wifi calling page at all because the tab for the subscription you
*aren't* trying to configure would always call finish() early.
The right long term solution to this problem is probably to remove the
tabbed UX entirely from this page, since we probably don't need it given
the overall new multi-SIM UX. But there may still be legacy uses and
that is likely a bigger change than we want to make right now.
As a stopgap, this CL just adds a check of isWfcProvisionedOnDevice to
the code for filtering out ineligible subscriptions from the tabbed
interface, which we should have always had anyway.
Fixes: 135591718
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: I656c3d3fb30cb6fabcb86685eae38c5f0cd0c6f2
Fixes: 134965754
Test: Verified slice appears when not enrolled.
Test: Verified slice does not appear when enrolled.
Test: Verified slice disappears after clicking on icon and going back
to settings page.
Change-Id: Id1c4458742ab622df8d5881e926fe54684b36843
This reverts commit 43374eabb8.
Reason for revert: No longer needed because we are using whitelist for
SMS permission
Fixes: 135213238
Test: presubmit
Change-Id: I182be4a1136521f325866e70e875439c17816ef2
For some kinds of telephony changes that might happen while we're
already showing one of these dialogs, we already get sent a new intent
for the dialog which we internally convert into a refresh of the dialog
contents instead of stacking a new copy on top of the old one.
But it turns out there are some other cases where the telephony stack
doesn't send a new intent for the dialog but *does* send a change event
through the SubscriptionManager, and we want to respond to those as
well. This CL adds a listener for those events.
Fixes: 135276696
Test: make RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: Ifb93ae95f45fda5831e112306dd9361ccaa5119c
(cherry picked from commit 6a1d7e60ac)
This fixes an exception in startActivity() call:
"android.util.AndroidRuntimeException: Calling startActivity() from outside of
an Activity context requires the FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK flag. Is this really
what you want?"
Bug: 132904820
Test: manual
Change-Id: I0c687ea76068778554b072b6cc8274352de6fa28
