RestrictedLockUtils was split into ...Internal

This means that in some cases RestrictedLockUtils has to be used and in
some RestrictedLockUtilsInternal.

This causes a lot of trivial code changes.

I also updated the ordering of the imports in all affected files.

Bug: 110953302
Test: Built
      make -j RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: I9bdf8b89134f853bae4f38c81af436715c73e924
This commit is contained in:
Philip P. Moltmann
2018-08-28 15:01:43 -07:00
parent a59ce66b3b
commit e3f721132a
79 changed files with 358 additions and 274 deletions

View File

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import android.provider.Settings;
import com.android.settings.Utils;
import com.android.settingslib.RestrictedLockUtils;
import com.android.settingslib.RestrictedLockUtilsInternal;
public class UserCapabilities {
boolean mEnabled = true;
@@ -67,9 +68,9 @@ public class UserCapabilities {
public void updateAddUserCapabilities(Context context) {
final UserManager userManager =
(UserManager) context.getSystemService(Context.USER_SERVICE);
mEnforcedAdmin = RestrictedLockUtils.checkIfRestrictionEnforced(context,
mEnforcedAdmin = RestrictedLockUtilsInternal.checkIfRestrictionEnforced(context,
UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_USER, UserHandle.myUserId());
final boolean hasBaseUserRestriction = RestrictedLockUtils.hasBaseUserRestriction(
final boolean hasBaseUserRestriction = RestrictedLockUtilsInternal.hasBaseUserRestriction(
context, UserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_USER, UserHandle.myUserId());
mDisallowAddUserSetByAdmin = mEnforcedAdmin != null && !hasBaseUserRestriction;
mDisallowAddUser = (mEnforcedAdmin != null || hasBaseUserRestriction);