RestrictedLockUtils was split into ...Internal

This means that in some cases RestrictedLockUtils has to be used and in
some RestrictedLockUtilsInternal.

This causes a lot of trivial code changes.

I also updated the ordering of the imports in all affected files.

Bug: 110953302
Test: Built
      make -j RunSettingsRoboTests
Change-Id: I9bdf8b89134f853bae4f38c81af436715c73e924
This commit is contained in:
Philip P. Moltmann
2018-08-28 15:01:43 -07:00
parent a59ce66b3b
commit e3f721132a
79 changed files with 358 additions and 274 deletions

View File

@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ import com.android.settings.search.BaseSearchIndexProvider;
import com.android.settings.search.Indexable;
import com.android.settings.search.SearchIndexableRaw;
import com.android.settingslib.RestrictedLockUtils;
import com.android.settingslib.RestrictedLockUtilsInternal;
import com.android.settingslib.deviceinfo.PrivateStorageInfo;
import com.android.settingslib.deviceinfo.StorageManagerVolumeProvider;
import com.android.settingslib.search.SearchIndexable;
@@ -460,10 +461,11 @@ public class StorageSettings extends SettingsPreferenceFragment implements Index
* @return {@code true} iff a intent was shown.
*/
private boolean wasAdminSupportIntentShown(@NonNull String restriction) {
EnforcedAdmin admin = RestrictedLockUtils.checkIfRestrictionEnforced(
getActivity(), restriction, UserHandle.myUserId());
EnforcedAdmin admin = RestrictedLockUtilsInternal
.checkIfRestrictionEnforced(getActivity(), restriction,
UserHandle.myUserId());
boolean hasBaseUserRestriction =
RestrictedLockUtils.hasBaseUserRestriction(
RestrictedLockUtilsInternal.hasBaseUserRestriction(
getActivity(), restriction, UserHandle.myUserId());
if (admin != null && !hasBaseUserRestriction) {
RestrictedLockUtils.sendShowAdminSupportDetailsIntent(getActivity(),