Refactor multiuser toggle to control user switch feature

The  name  "Allow multiple users" is too ambiguous. It sounds like by toggling it off, the feature is completely disabled. In fact, it only hides user switcher. In conjunction with hiding other users from the list, it makes it appear as all the users get deleted when the toggle is off. On the contrary, users might be running in background when the toggle is off.

After this change, the new name better represents the intention behind this toggle, as well as makes the UI more intuitive. The users are not being hidden anymore. But switching preference gets disabled.

Since the toggle can only be enabled or disabled by owner (after this refactoring), it means that Owner has full control over multiuser settings and is able to perform actions on users without having to enable the toggle.

Bug: 336762423
Test: atest UserSettingsTest && atest UserDetailsSettingsTest
Flag: android.multiuser.new_multiuser_settings_ux
Change-Id: Id9d507039b58d3df66fe78710409716fd4816890
This commit is contained in:
Tetiana Meronyk
2024-05-01 13:15:34 +00:00
parent 3cac411486
commit caef61b5eb
8 changed files with 132 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@@ -46,10 +46,15 @@ import android.content.pm.ResolveInfo;
import android.content.pm.UserInfo;
import android.graphics.Bitmap;
import android.graphics.drawable.Drawable;
import android.multiuser.Flags;
import android.os.Bundle;
import android.os.Looper;
import android.os.UserHandle;
import android.os.UserManager;
import android.platform.test.annotations.RequiresFlagsDisabled;
import android.platform.test.annotations.RequiresFlagsEnabled;
import android.platform.test.flag.junit.CheckFlagsRule;
import android.platform.test.flag.junit.DeviceFlagsValueProvider;
import android.provider.Settings;
import android.text.SpannableStringBuilder;
import android.view.Menu;
@@ -75,6 +80,7 @@ import com.android.settingslib.search.SearchIndexableRaw;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Ignore;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.AdditionalMatchers;
@@ -142,6 +148,9 @@ public class UserSettingsTest {
private UserSettings mFragment;
private UserCapabilities mUserCapabilities;
@Rule
public final CheckFlagsRule mCheckFlagsRule = DeviceFlagsValueProvider.createCheckFlagsRule();
@Before
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
@@ -406,6 +415,7 @@ public class UserSettingsTest {
}
@Test
@RequiresFlagsDisabled({Flags.FLAG_NEW_MULTIUSER_SETTINGS_UX})
public void updateUserList_addUserDisallowedByAdmin_shouldNotShowAddUser() {
RestrictedLockUtils.EnforcedAdmin enforcedAdmin = mock(
RestrictedLockUtils.EnforcedAdmin.class);
@@ -420,6 +430,22 @@ public class UserSettingsTest {
verify(mAddUserPreference).setVisible(false);
}
@Test
@RequiresFlagsEnabled({Flags.FLAG_NEW_MULTIUSER_SETTINGS_UX})
public void updateUserList_addUserDisallowedByAdmin_shouldShowPrefDisabledByAdmin() {
RestrictedLockUtils.EnforcedAdmin enforcedAdmin = mock(
RestrictedLockUtils.EnforcedAdmin.class);
mUserCapabilities.mEnforcedAdmin = enforcedAdmin;
mUserCapabilities.mCanAddUser = false;
mUserCapabilities.mDisallowAddUser = true;
mUserCapabilities.mDisallowAddUserSetByAdmin = true;
doReturn(true).when(mAddUserPreference).isEnabled();
mFragment.updateUserList();
verify(mAddUserPreference).setDisabledByAdmin(enforcedAdmin);
}
@Test
public void updateUserList_cannotAddUserButCanSwitchUser_shouldNotShowAddUser() {
mUserCapabilities.mCanAddUser = false;
@@ -461,18 +487,31 @@ public class UserSettingsTest {
}
@Test
public void updateUserList_userSwitcherDisabled_shouldNotShowAddUser() {
public void updateUserList_userSwitcherDisabled_shouldShowAddUser() {
givenUsers(getAdminUser(true));
mUserCapabilities.mCanAddUser = true;
mUserCapabilities.mUserSwitcherEnabled = false;
mFragment.updateUserList();
verify(mAddUserPreference).setVisible(false);
verify(mAddUserPreference).setVisible(true);
}
@Test
public void updateUserList_userSwitcherDisabled_shouldNotShowAddGuest() {
public void updateUserList_userSwitcherDisabled_shouldShowAddGuest() {
givenUsers(getAdminUser(true));
mUserCapabilities.mCanAddGuest = true;
mUserCapabilities.mUserSwitcherEnabled = false;
doReturn(true)
.when(mUserManager).canAddMoreUsers(eq(UserManager.USER_TYPE_FULL_GUEST));
mFragment.updateUserList();
verify(mAddGuestPreference).setVisible(true);
}
@Test
public void updateUserList_userSwitcherDisabledCannotAddMoreGuests_shouldNotShowAddGuest() {
givenUsers(getAdminUser(true));
mUserCapabilities.mCanAddGuest = true;
mUserCapabilities.mUserSwitcherEnabled = false;
@@ -533,18 +572,18 @@ public class UserSettingsTest {
}
@Test
public void updateUserList_existingSecondaryUser_shouldAddOnlyCurrUser_MultiUserIsDisabled() {
public void updateUserList_existingSecondaryUser_shouldAddAllUsers_MultiUserIsDisabled() {
givenUsers(getAdminUser(true), getSecondaryUser(false));
mUserCapabilities.mUserSwitcherEnabled = false;
mFragment.updateUserList();
ArgumentCaptor<UserPreference> captor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(UserPreference.class);
verify(mFragment.mUserListCategory, times(1))
verify(mFragment.mUserListCategory, times(2))
.addPreference(captor.capture());
List<UserPreference> userPrefs = captor.getAllValues();
assertThat(userPrefs.size()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(userPrefs.size()).isEqualTo(2);
assertThat(userPrefs.get(0)).isSameInstanceAs(mMePreference);
}