4/n: Remove challenge from choose/confirm, use new path
Biometric enrollment will not request a Gatekeeper HAT during
initial credential setup or credential confirmation anymore.
Instead, it is broken down into the following steps now.
Bug: 161765592
1) Request credential setup / confirmation to return a
Gatekeeper Password
2) Biometric enrollment will generate a challenge
3) Biometric enrollment will request LockSettingsService to
verify(GatekeeperPassword, challenge), and upon verification,
the Gatekeeper HAT will be returned.
Since both LockSettingsService and Biometric enroll/settings
make use of biometric challenges, this allows us to make the
challenge ownership/lifecycle clear (vs. previously, where
LockSettingsService has no idea who the challenge belongs to).
Exempt-From-Owner-Approval:For files not owned by our team,
(StorageWizard), this change is just a method rename
Test: RunSettingsRoboTests
Run the following on face/fingerprint devices
Test: Remove credential
adb shell am start -a android.app.action.SET_NEW_PASSWORD
Set up credential + fingerprint
Test: Remove credential,
adb shell am start -a android.settings.FINGERPRINT_SETTINGS
This tests the ChooseLock* logic in FingerprintSettings
Test: Set up credential,
adb shell am start -a android.settings.FINGERPRINT_SETTINGS
This tests the ConfirmLock* logic in FingerprintSettings
Test: Remove device credential, enroll fingerprint/face. Succeeds.
This tests the ChooseLock* returning SP path from
BiometricEnrollIntro
Test: With credential and fingerprint/face enrolled, go to
fingerprint/face settings and enroll. This tests the
ConfirmLock* path in Fingerprint/FaceSettings
Test: Remove device credential, enroll credential-only, enroll
fingerprint/face separately. Succeeds. This tests the
ConfirmLock* returning SP path in BiometricEnrollIntro
Test: In SUW, set up credential, then biometric. This tests
the ChooseLock* path in SUW
Test: In SUW, set up credential, go back, then set up biometric.
This tests the ConfirmLock* path in SUW
Change-Id: Idf6fcb43f7497323d089eb9c37125294e7a7f5dc
This commit is contained in:
@@ -42,8 +42,7 @@ abstract class SaveChosenLockWorkerBase extends Fragment {
|
||||
private Intent mResultData;
|
||||
|
||||
protected LockPatternUtils mUtils;
|
||||
protected boolean mHasChallenge;
|
||||
protected long mChallenge;
|
||||
protected boolean mRequestGatekeeperPassword;
|
||||
protected boolean mWasSecureBefore;
|
||||
protected int mUserId;
|
||||
protected int mUnificationProfileId = UserHandle.USER_NULL;
|
||||
@@ -69,12 +68,10 @@ abstract class SaveChosenLockWorkerBase extends Fragment {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected void prepare(LockPatternUtils utils, boolean credentialRequired,
|
||||
boolean hasChallenge, long challenge, int userId) {
|
||||
boolean requestGatekeeperPassword, int userId) {
|
||||
mUtils = utils;
|
||||
mUserId = userId;
|
||||
|
||||
mHasChallenge = hasChallenge;
|
||||
mChallenge = challenge;
|
||||
mRequestGatekeeperPassword = requestGatekeeperPassword;
|
||||
// This will be a no-op for non managed profiles.
|
||||
mWasSecureBefore = mUtils.isSecure(mUserId);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user