UM.getUserHandle -> UM.getProcessUserId
UM is being made @UserHandleAware, so using an explicit method avoids ambiguity. Bug: 201679968 Test: (No-op) compiles and treehugger Change-Id: If067af7ced5017a9689cafbf99ceec1d26c06b3b
This commit is contained in:
@@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ public abstract class AppStateAppOpsBridge extends AppStateBaseBridge {
|
||||
if (entries == null) {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
final ArrayMap<String, PermissionState> entriesForProfile = entries.get(mUserManager
|
||||
.getUserHandle());
|
||||
final ArrayMap<String, PermissionState> entriesForProfile =
|
||||
entries.get(mUserManager.getProcessUserId());
|
||||
if (entriesForProfile == null) {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -316,8 +316,8 @@ public abstract class AppStateAppOpsBridge extends AppStateBaseBridge {
|
||||
}
|
||||
loadPermissionsStates(entries);
|
||||
loadAppOpsStates(entries);
|
||||
final ArrayMap<String, PermissionState> entriesForProfile = entries.get(mUserManager
|
||||
.getUserHandle());
|
||||
final ArrayMap<String, PermissionState> entriesForProfile =
|
||||
entries.get(mUserManager.getProcessUserId());
|
||||
if (entriesForProfile == null) {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user