* Assume a user knows what they are flashing and skip the check
of whether or not the build they are flashing is older than the
TWRP image they are using (which really isn't at all relevant
to the ROM's build date anyway).
Change-Id: I74ca5a6dc604268bf38f85ec1861f3eaafd9bf06
Otherwise the applypatch executable will fail to back up the source
file to /cache when patching the recovery image.
Bug: 74198354
Test: run applypatch from boot to recovery
(cherry picked from commit b4e3a370bf)
Change-Id: I37b7fd88d66ab49ef953d4b7dca22577bd1472e1
Otherwise the applypatch executable will fail to back up the source
file to /cache when patching the recovery image.
Bug: 74198354
Test: run applypatch from boot to recovery
Change-Id: I6e5b9cd06d6ed0b26066b779a348437ecf984b92
The "subdirs=" statement no longer has any effect (with the CL in [1]
that's merged last November). All the Android.bp's will be picked up
automatically.
[1] commit 4f21237342e715cbbac6e409cd67e86a304483c4 in
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/build/blueprint/+/530115.
Test: mmma -j bootable/recovery
Change-Id: Idd39af1fff907e8c1886f91eea0dd4a9e38a4079
Move the module into a separate directory so that we can export only the
expected header.
With this change, minadbd no longer needs to include bootable/recovery.
Test: mmma -j bootable/recovery
Change-Id: I69b888ceb160a33a67d79c5bda208dc17ad6ed86
This class allows us to set the following locations dynamically:
cache_temp_source, last_command_file, stash_directory_base.
In the updater's main function, we reset the values of these variables
to their default locations in /cache; while we can set them to temp
files in unit tests or host simulation.
Test: unit tests pass
Change-Id: I528652650caa41373617ab055d41b1f1a4ec0f87
In BlockImageVerify some commands are undefined, e.g. "erase", "new",
"zero". And we should not error out if the corresponding function
pointer of these commands is null; otherwise we will fail the
verification.
The old code is:
if (cmd->f != nullptr && cmd->f(params) == -1)
return false;
In the last_command_file change the logic was wrongly modified to
if (cmd->f == nullptr)
return false;
...
if (cmd->f(params) == -1)
return false;
Test: sideload an incremental OTA twice on bullhead
Change-Id: I2561c365badb850da0e416629ccd61f0df7da5d7
In the split mode of imgdiff, we used to assume that the size of a split
target chunk is always greater than the blocksize i.e. 4096. This may
lead to the following assertion failure:
I0221 04:57:33.451323 818464 common.py:205 imgdiff F 02-21 04:57:33 821203 821203 imgdiff.cpp:999]
Check failed: tgt_size >= BLOCK_SIZE (tgt_size=476, BLOCK_SIZE=4096)
This CL removes the assumption and handles the edge cases.
Test: generate and verify the incremental update for TFs in the bug; unit test passes
Bug: 73757557
Bug: 73711365
Change-Id: Iadbb4ee658995f5856cd488f3793980881a59620